 |
| Independence Day celebrations - remembering history Photo by Carol M. Highsmith, courtesy of Flickr Commons license |
by Gregory Saville
Today it is American Independence Day! Three days ago it was Canada Day (Happy birthday to my Canadian and American peeps). National birthdays are times of reflection about our past and lessons learned, which makes today’s blog about social amnesia all the more salient.
I first used the term social amnesia in a blog where I described my C. Ray Jeffery Moments about how practitioners in Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design - CPTED - and more appallingly, the instructors who teach them, fail to read the original CPTED texts or learn from the original CPTED pioneers about the vision for CPTED.
I thought myself quite clever in coining social amnesia forgetting that historian Russell Jacoby had long ago invented the term. Talk about a perfect, and well-deserved, pie-in-my-face moment! I digress.
I have written about social amnesia a number of times – for example, while reviewing the book Designing Out Crime by Garis and Maxim. Those authors ignored an entire golden age of CPTED in British Columbia, where they live, in describing crime prevention abroad.
 |
| Making Cities Work: The Dynamics of Urban Innovation by David Morley, Stuart Proudfoot, Thomas Burns. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado (1980) |
Reflecting on that, a question came to mind: What do you get when you put a political scientist, an urban planning scholar, an ethicist, and a criminologist in the same room? Sometimes, when you put brilliant minds together, you get a breakthrough in how to prevent crime, feed people, deliver health, and protect the environment. I’m referring to a chapter in an urban planning book from my past – Making Cities Work.
The book emerged from a conference in 1977 at the Faculty of Environmental Studies at York University, Toronto and one of the organizers, and co-author, was my former graduate supervisor (one of those brilliant minds) urban geographer, and former Dean, David Morley. The innovation I’m describing is a chapter by four scholars with the seemingly innocuous title: “Institutions for Neighborhood Self-Development”.
 |
| Neighborhoods need places that are safe, seatable, and social |
READING HISTORY
All that to say, it is important to read history. It is the lifeblood of our future success – or failure. I have just seen yet another droll website on “innovations in CPTED” from a security consulting firm. It claimed the “latest in CPTED” but that turned into another gross misreading of what CPTED is all about. The author spoke of lighting and target hardening. She referenced her trainer who clearly has not read the foundational documents of CPTED. More amnesia!
Too often people engaged in day to day projects, jobs, and research ignore (or don’t read) the history that led to where we are now. This is shameful – especially for those who should know better. That is why academics include literature reviews within their studies to ensure they acknowledge their history.
It brought to mind the message in that chapter on urban innovation, and how it ties into all the work we do in CPTED, especially with a SafeGrowth angle.
 |
| When it comes to preventing crime, neighborhood greenery and walkability matters |
NEIGHBORHOODS MATTER
The urban innovation authors wrote on the neighborhood as the center of urban life – as did the original CPTED writers. For proof, read Newman’s Communities of Interest, or Fowler’s ground-breaking evaluation of the Hartford neighborhood CPTED project. Like the CPTED pioneers, the urban innovation writers also knew that the neighborhood must be the center of service delivery for health, education, environmental concerns, and security. To them the neighborhood was where everything mattered, a theme we replicate in SafeGrowth.
This all seems so obvious today. It is commonplace in urban studies and crime prevention research. The language of these professions references neighborhoods as the center of interest: collective efficacy to improve neighborhoods, asset-based community development, neighborhood capital, and activation and community engagement.
But 40 years ago when they wrote this chapter, neighborhoods were not seen that way. Interestingly, these four brilliant minds all became famous, thought-leading scholars.
- Louis Mascotti, held professorships in three disciplines including economics, political science and real estate. He founded Northwestern University’s Center for Urban Affairs and the Real Estate Center.
- John McKnight, a well-known scholar of urban affairs, created asset mapping, one of the tools we use extensively in SafeGrowth. He also co-authored the seminal book Building Communities from the Inside Out and authored The Careless Society: Community and its Counterfeits.
- Stan Hallett, an urban planning scholar and ethicist at Northwestern University marched with Martin Luthur King, Jr in the 1960s.
- Frederic Dubow, a professor of sociology and criminal justice at the University of Illinois, wrote that crime prevention was the community responsibility and it is the means by which citizens exercise their civil rights. He was one of the first criminologists to write prominently about citizen participation in crime prevention.
 |
| Neighborhoods need a core landmark, or something to remember |
IN THE YEARS THAT FOLLOWED
Each of these authors, in their own way, built on the premise that the neighborhood – as the primary unit of geography - is the key for preventing crime and improving livability. Notice that they did not mean community, that nebulous phrase that means everything and nothing. Rather, they meant neighborhood as a specific place with geographical boundaries, an identifiable population, and unique buildings, parks, schools, businesses, and residential areas. A place people call home!
That was the original focus of both CPTED and urban innovation. We emphasize in our work that geography matters. Too large and programs get lost in the policy or politics of the day. Too small and you end up with target hardening to prevent drug deals in the park, but then you just move it elsewhere, fail to address fear, or leave the important questions unanswered. The key is in the middle…right-sizing. That means the neighborhood. Remember the lessons of history.
There is a whole section of the SafeGrowth website on the characteristics of some great neighborhoods we have seen over the years. Let’s not lose the important legacy of the first efforts to rebuild community life and prevent crime.
In the meantime, Happy Birthday!
Post a Comment